T
The StoryGraph
11
Personalized Reading Challenges
K
keen
Nov 13, 2021

I'd love to see a form of Reading Challenges made for a single user. I like the idea of Reading Challenges, but I struggle to find ones that encourages me to look at something new without throwing me far out of my interests.

The closest I can find to this is To-Read Pile Suggestions for Plus members. In this case, the idea would be to go outside of your To-Read Pile and stick you to a schedule within a time period, like weekly or monthly.

Like Recommendations and Preferences, being able to keep genres and topics excluded would help keep a challenge within a person's comfort zone. For example, I don't want a reading challenge suggesting me to read religious works. While that may be outside of my comfort zones, that wouldn't be a very enjoyable challenge. Being able to randomize based on category, maybe even to-do pile, would be helpful as well.

Possible ways this could be handled:

- If my statistics judge that I read a lot of fiction books, my personalized reading challenge will only give me fiction books.  

- If I read a lot of fiction books focused on science fiction, I might be recommended a nonfiction book detailing the evolution of science fiction media.  

- Categorize based on Up-Next and Recommendations? "Read this book from your recommendations this month, continue this series this month, etc."  

- Specify genres you'd like to focus on "Only recommend me horror and thriller books for this week/month/year."  

Alternatively, or as an add-on, have community Reading Challenges suggested to you based on filters that match your interests.

From there on, you could edit your challenges to better fit who you are than what a robot things you are.

I'd love to hear further expansion or alternate considerations on this idea! I imagine this would be far, far off into the future, but a person can only hope!

Comments
N
Nadia
Nov 14, 2021

What a fun idea! Super interesting. As you say, anything like this would be far into the future, but certainly in line with the sort of advanced functionality we'd love to offer at some point. :-)

3